cad: be useful in design

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents work
Weight: 0.55
, application
Weight: 0.53
, computer program
Weight: 0.51
, computer
Weight: 0.50
, word
Weight: 0.48
Siblings asshole
Weight: 0.31
, computer programmer
Weight: 0.30
, whore
Weight: 0.30
, computer game
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful in design 1.00
be used in design process 0.88
is useful 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(computer, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cad, be useful in design)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(application, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cad, be useful in design)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cad, be useful in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(application, is useful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cad, be useful in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(computer, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cad, be useful in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(application, is useful)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cad, be useful in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(computer, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cad, be useful in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(cad, be useful in design)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(application, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cad, be useful in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(cad, be useful in design)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cad, be useful in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(cad, be useful in design)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cad, be useful in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cad, be used in design process)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(cad, be useful in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(cad, be used in design process)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cad, be useful in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cad, be used in design process)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(cad, be useful in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cad, be used in design process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(cad, be useful in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cad, is useful)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cad, be useful in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(cad, is useful)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(cad, be useful in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(cad, is useful)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cad, be useful in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(cad, is useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(cad, be useful in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cad, be useful in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cad, be useful in design)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cad, be useful in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cad, be useful in design)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cad, be useful in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(application, is useful)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cad, be useful in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(cad, be useful in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(application, is useful)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(cad, be useful in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer, is useful)