caddy: has quality definition

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents golf course
Weight: 0.60
, car
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, person
Weight: 0.50
Siblings golf ball
Weight: 0.33
, tee
Weight: 0.32
, golfing
Weight: 0.32
, putt
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality definition 1.00
has quality good 0.76
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(golf course, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(caddy, has quality definition)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(caddy, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(golf course, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(caddy, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(golf course, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(caddy, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(caddy, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(golf course, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(caddy, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(caddy, has quality definition)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(caddy, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(golf ball, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(golf ball, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(caddy, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(golf ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(golf ball, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(caddy, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(caddy, has quality definition)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(caddy, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(caddy, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(caddy, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(caddy, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(caddy, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(caddy, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(caddy, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(caddy, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(caddy, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(caddy, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(caddy, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(caddy, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(caddy, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(caddy, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(caddy, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(caddy, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(caddy, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(caddy, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(caddy, has quality definition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(caddy, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(caddy, has quality definition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(caddy, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf course, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(caddy, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(golf ball, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(caddy, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(golf ball, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(caddy, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf course, has quality bad)