caddy: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents golf course
Weight: 0.60
, car
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, person
Weight: 0.50
Siblings golf ball
Weight: 0.33
, tee
Weight: 0.32
, golfing
Weight: 0.32
, putt
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality worth 0.85
has quality evil 0.78
has quality definition 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(golf course, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(caddy, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(golf course, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(golf course, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(golf course, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(caddy, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(golf ball, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(golf ball, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(golf ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(golf ball, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(caddy, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(caddy, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(caddy, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(caddy, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(caddy, has quality worth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(caddy, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(caddy, has quality worth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(caddy, has quality worth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(caddy, has quality evil)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(caddy, has quality definition)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(caddy, has quality evil)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(caddy, has quality worth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(caddy, has quality definition)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(caddy, has quality definition)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(caddy, has quality evil)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(caddy, has quality definition)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(caddy, has quality evil)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(caddy, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(caddy, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf course, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(golf ball, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(golf ball, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(caddy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf course, has quality bad)