cafe: be at paris

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents location
Weight: 0.62
, business
Weight: 0.59
, restaurant
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.56
, feature
Weight: 0.55
Siblings chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.68
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at paris 1.00
be at london 0.78
be at montreal 0.77
be at naples italy 0.77
be at nyc 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cafe, be at paris)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at montreal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cafe, be at paris)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cafe, be at paris)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at montreal)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at montreal)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cafe, be at paris)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at nyc)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cafe, be at paris)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cafe, be at paris)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(cafe, be at paris)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cafe, be at london)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cafe, be at paris)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(cafe, be at london)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cafe, be at paris)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cafe, be at naples italy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(cafe, be at paris)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cafe, be at naples italy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(cafe, be at paris)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cafe, be at london)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(cafe, be at paris)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cafe, be at london)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(cafe, be at paris)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cafe, be at naples italy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(cafe, be at paris)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(cafe, be at naples italy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(cafe, be at paris)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(cafe, be at paris)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cafe, be at paris)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cafe, be at paris)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(cafe, be at paris)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cafe, be at paris)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at nyc)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cafe, be at paris)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at montreal)