cafeteria: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.62
, room
Weight: 0.61
, high school
Weight: 0.59
, classroom
Weight: 0.59
Siblings school cafeteria
Weight: 0.38
, dining room
Weight: 0.36
, laundry room
Weight: 0.36
, auditorium
Weight: 0.35
, gymnasium
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality service 0.81
has quality worst 0.80
has quality joke 0.79
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(room, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(classroom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(classroom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(classroom, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(high school, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(high school, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(high school, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(high school, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(classroom, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(room, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(classroom, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(room, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(classroom, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(high school, has quality worst)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(high school, is best)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(high school, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(classroom, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(room, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(high school, has quality worst)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(classroom, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(room, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(classroom, has quality better)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(high school, is best)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(room, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cafeteria, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(classroom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cafeteria, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cafeteria, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(classroom, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cafeteria, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(classroom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cafeteria, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(high school, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cafeteria, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(high school, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cafeteria, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(high school, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cafeteria, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(cafeteria, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(cafeteria, has quality service)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(high school, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(classroom, has quality better)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(classroom, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(room, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(classroom, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(room, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(high school, has quality worst)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(high school, is best)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(classroom, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(room, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(high school, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(classroom, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(classroom, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(room, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(high school, has quality worst)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cafeteria, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(high school, is best)