cage: is free eggs better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.60
, artist
Weight: 0.55
, bird
Weight: 0.52
, device
Weight: 0.50
Siblings crate
Weight: 0.33
, barn owl
Weight: 0.32
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.32
, fence
Weight: 0.32
, doorknob
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is free eggs better 1.00
is free eggs 0.97
is eggs better 0.95
is free chicken better 0.88
has physical part eggs 0.87
is free better 0.85
is free chicken 0.84
is free 0.80
is chicken better 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fence, is free)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(fence, is free)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(fence, is free)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(cage, is free eggs better)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(cage, is eggs better)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cage, is free eggs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cage, is free chicken better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(cage, is free chicken better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cage, is free chicken better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cage, is eggs better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(cage, is eggs better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cage, has physical part eggs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(cage, is eggs better)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(cage, is free chicken better)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cage, is free better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cage, is free)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cage, is free chicken)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cage, is free eggs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cage, is free chicken)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cage, is chicken better)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cage, is free eggs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(cage, has physical part eggs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(cage, is free)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cage, is free chicken)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(cage, is free chicken)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(cage, is free better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cage, is chicken better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(cage, is chicken better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(cage, is free eggs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cage, is free better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(cage, is free)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(cage, is chicken better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(cage, has physical part eggs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(cage, is free better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(cage, has physical part eggs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cage, is free)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cage, is free eggs better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cage, is free eggs better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cage, is free eggs better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fence, is free)