cajun: be french in danger disappearing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flavor
Weight: 0.57
, new orleans
Weight: 0.53
, restaurant
Weight: 0.53
, seasoning
Weight: 0.45
, food
Weight: 0.45
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be french in danger of disappearing 1.00
be french in danger disappearing 1.00
be french in danger 0.92
be french different from french 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cajun, be french in danger disappearing)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cajun, be french in danger disappearing)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(cajun, be french in danger disappearing)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(cajun, be french in danger of disappearing)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cajun, be french in danger disappearing)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(cajun, be french in danger of disappearing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cajun, be french in danger disappearing)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(cajun, be french in danger of disappearing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(cajun, be french in danger disappearing)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cajun, be french in danger of disappearing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(cajun, be french in danger disappearing)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(cajun, be french in danger)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(cajun, be french in danger disappearing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cajun, be french in danger)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(cajun, be french in danger disappearing)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cajun, be french different from french)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(cajun, be french in danger disappearing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(cajun, be french different from french)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cajun, be french in danger disappearing)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(cajun, be french different from french)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cajun, be french in danger disappearing)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(cajun, be french different from french)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cajun, be french in danger disappearing)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(cajun, be french in danger)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cajun, be french in danger disappearing)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(cajun, be french in danger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cajun, be french in danger disappearing)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(cajun, be french in danger disappearing)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cajun, be french in danger disappearing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cajun, be french in danger disappearing)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(cajun, be french in danger disappearing)