calculator: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.68
, application
Weight: 0.63
, electronic device
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.60
Siblings abacus
Weight: 0.47
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.36
, pencil sharpener
Weight: 0.34
, app
Weight: 0.34
, compass
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality plus 0.84
has quality definition 0.76
be better 0.76
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(calculator, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(calculator, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tool, is best)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(calculator, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(tool, is best)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tool, is best)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pencil sharpener, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(app, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(calculator, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(calculator, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tool, is best)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(calculator, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(app, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(app, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pencil sharpener, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pencil sharpener, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(abacus, has quality definition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(calculator, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(calculator, has quality plus)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(calculator, has quality plus)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(calculator, has quality plus)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality plus)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(calculator, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(app, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(abacus, has quality definition)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pencil sharpener, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is best)