calculus: be useful in science

Related concepts

Parents	math Weight: 0.61 , topic Weight: 0.60 , thing Weight: 0.59 , course Weight: 0.59 , subject Weight: 0.58
Siblings	linear algebra Weight: 0.64 , mathematics Weight: 0.35 , algebra Weight: 0.34 , arithmetic Weight: 0.33 , boolean algebra Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be useful in science	1.00
be needed for computer science	0.85
be useful in engineering	0.85
be connected to science	0.84
be required for computer science	0.83
be important in biology	0.83
be important for physics	0.81
be important in physics	0.80
be helpful for biology majors	0.80
be integrated into computer science	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(math, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(calculus, be useful in science)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(math, be important in physics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(calculus, be useful in science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(math, be useful in science)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(math, be important in physics)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(math, be useful in science)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(math, be important in physics)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important in physics)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(math, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(calculus, be useful in science)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(math, be important in physics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(calculus, be useful in science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(mathematics, be important in physics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important in physics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(calculus, be useful in science)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be needed for computer science)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(calculus, be useful in engineering)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be required for computer science)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be useful in engineering)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be important in biology)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be helpful for biology majors)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(calculus, be connected to science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be important for physics)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be important in physics)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be integrated into computer science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(calculus, be useful in engineering)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(calculus, be integrated into computer science)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(calculus, be connected to science)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(calculus, be useful in engineering)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(calculus, be needed for computer science)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(calculus, be required for computer science)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(calculus, be connected to science)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(calculus, be important in biology)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(calculus, be important in physics)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(calculus, be integrated into computer science)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(calculus, be important for physics)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(calculus, be integrated into computer science)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(calculus, be helpful for biology majors)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(calculus, be important in physics)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(calculus, be important in physics)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(calculus, be required for computer science)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(calculus, be needed for computer science)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(calculus, be important in biology)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(calculus, be important for physics)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(calculus, be important in biology)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(calculus, be important for physics)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(calculus, be needed for computer science)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(calculus, be required for computer science)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(calculus, be helpful for biology majors)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(calculus, be helpful for biology majors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(calculus, be useful in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(math, be useful in science)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(math, be important in physics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(mathematics, be important in physics)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(math, be useful in science)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(math, be important in physics)