calgary: be colder than vancouver

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
, canada
Weight: 0.56
, community
Weight: 0.50
, team
Weight: 0.50
Siblings montreal
Weight: 0.34
, quebec city
Weight: 0.34
, alberta
Weight: 0.34
, toronto
Weight: 0.34
, mexico city
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be colder than vancouver 1.00
get less precipitation than vancouver 0.88
be better than edmonton 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(calgary, be colder than vancouver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(toronto, be colder than vancouver)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(calgary, be colder than vancouver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(toronto, be colder than vancouver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(toronto, be colder than vancouver)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(calgary, be colder than vancouver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(calgary, be colder than vancouver)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(calgary, be colder than vancouver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(calgary, be better than edmonton)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(calgary, be colder than vancouver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(calgary, get less precipitation than vancouver)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(calgary, be colder than vancouver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(calgary, be better than edmonton)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(calgary, be colder than vancouver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(calgary, be better than edmonton)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(calgary, be colder than vancouver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(calgary, be better than edmonton)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(calgary, be colder than vancouver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(calgary, get less precipitation than vancouver)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(calgary, be colder than vancouver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(calgary, get less precipitation than vancouver)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(calgary, be colder than vancouver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(calgary, get less precipitation than vancouver)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(calgary, be colder than vancouver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(calgary, be colder than vancouver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(calgary, be colder than vancouver)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(calgary, be colder than vancouver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(calgary, be colder than vancouver)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(calgary, be colder than vancouver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(toronto, be colder than vancouver)