calgary: be important to canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
, canada
Weight: 0.56
, community
Weight: 0.50
, team
Weight: 0.50
Siblings montreal
Weight: 0.34
, quebec city
Weight: 0.34
, alberta
Weight: 0.34
, toronto
Weight: 0.34
, mexico city
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to canada 1.00
be important city in alberta 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(calgary, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alberta, be important to canada)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(calgary, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(quebec city, be important to canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(calgary, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(quebec city, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(quebec city, be important to canada)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(calgary, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(alberta, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(alberta, be important to canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(calgary, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(calgary, be important to canada)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(calgary, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(calgary, be important city in alberta)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(calgary, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(calgary, be important city in alberta)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(calgary, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(calgary, be important city in alberta)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(calgary, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(calgary, be important city in alberta)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(calgary, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(calgary, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(calgary, be important to canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(calgary, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(calgary, be important to canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(calgary, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(alberta, be important to canada)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(calgary, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(quebec city, be important to canada)