call: be used to hunt duck

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents statement
Weight: 0.63
, cell phone
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.56
, action
Weight: 0.56
Siblings reaction
Weight: 0.56
, cellular phone
Weight: 0.34
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.33
, press
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to hunt duck 1.00
be used to attract duck 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(call, be used to hunt duck)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(call, be used to hunt duck)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(call, be used to hunt duck)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(call, be used to attract duck)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(call, be used to hunt duck)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(call, be used to attract duck)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(call, be used to hunt duck)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(call, be used to attract duck)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(call, be used to hunt duck)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(call, be used to attract duck)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(call, be used to hunt duck)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(call, be used to hunt duck)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(call, be used to hunt duck)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(call, be used to hunt duck)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(call, be used to hunt duck)