call: was created

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents statement
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, cell phone
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.56
Siblings recording
Weight: 0.60
, reaction
Weight: 0.56
, calling
Weight: 0.49
, offside
Weight: 0.46
, reveille
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
was created 1.00
was invented 0.79
was kacip fatimah 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cell phone, was invented)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(call, was created)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(call, was created)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cell phone, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(call, was created)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, was invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cell phone, was invented)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(call, was created)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(call, was created)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(call, was created)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(call, was created)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(call, was created)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(call, was kacip fatimah)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(call, was created)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(call, was invented)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(call, was created)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(call, was kacip fatimah)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(call, was created)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(call, was kacip fatimah)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(call, was created)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(call, was kacip fatimah)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(call, was created)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(call, was invented)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(call, was created)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(call, was invented)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(call, was created)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(call, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(call, was created)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(call, was created)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(call, was created)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(call, was created)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(call, was created)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(call, was created)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cell phone, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(call, was created)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cell phone, was invented)