call: was kacip fatimah

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents statement
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, cell phone
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.56
Siblings recording
Weight: 0.60
, reaction
Weight: 0.56
, calling
Weight: 0.49
, offside
Weight: 0.46
, reveille
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
was kacip fatimah 1.00
was made 0.86
was created 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(cell phone, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(call, was kacip fatimah)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(call, was kacip fatimah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(cell phone, was made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(call, was kacip fatimah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, was made)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(cell phone, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(call, was kacip fatimah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(call, was kacip fatimah)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(call, was kacip fatimah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(call, was kacip fatimah)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(call, was kacip fatimah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(call, was made)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(call, was kacip fatimah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(call, was created)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(call, was kacip fatimah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(call, was made)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(call, was kacip fatimah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(call, was made)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(call, was kacip fatimah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(call, was created)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(call, was kacip fatimah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(call, was created)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(call, was kacip fatimah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(call, was made)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(call, was kacip fatimah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(call, was created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(call, was kacip fatimah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(call, was kacip fatimah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(call, was kacip fatimah)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(call, was kacip fatimah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(call, was kacip fatimah)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(call, was kacip fatimah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(cell phone, was made)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(call, was kacip fatimah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(cell phone, was made)