calling: is difficult

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.52
, telephone
Weight: 0.51
, call
Weight: 0.49
, information
Weight: 0.49
Siblings talking
Weight: 0.32
, cellular telephone
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31
, dial
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is difficult 1.00
be for time hard 0.79
be for first time hard 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(calling, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(talking, is difficult)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(calling, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(talking, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(talking, is difficult)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(calling, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(calling, is difficult)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(calling, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(calling, be for time hard)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(calling, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(calling, be for time hard)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(calling, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(calling, be for first time hard)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(calling, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(calling, be for time hard)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(calling, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(calling, be for first time hard)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(calling, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(calling, be for first time hard)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(calling, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(calling, be for first time hard)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(calling, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(calling, be for time hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(calling, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(calling, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(calling, is difficult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(calling, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(calling, is difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(calling, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(talking, is difficult)