calling: is explicitly bad thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.52
, telephone
Weight: 0.51
, call
Weight: 0.49
, information
Weight: 0.49
Siblings talking
Weight: 0.32
, cellular telephone
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31
, dial
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is explicitly bad thing 1.00
is explicitly thing 0.98
is bad thing 0.83
is thing 0.79
is now thing 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(talking, is thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(talking, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(talking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(talking, is thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(calling, is explicitly bad thing)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(calling, is explicitly thing)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(calling, is explicitly thing)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(calling, is explicitly thing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(calling, is thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(calling, is now thing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(calling, is explicitly thing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(calling, is thing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(calling, is now thing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(calling, is thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(calling, is bad thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(calling, is now thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(calling, is bad thing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(calling, is bad thing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(calling, is thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(calling, is now thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(calling, is bad thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(calling, is explicitly bad thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(calling, is explicitly bad thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(talking, is thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(calling, is explicitly bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(talking, is bad thing)