calling: is misleading

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.52
, telephone
Weight: 0.51
, call
Weight: 0.49
, information
Weight: 0.49
Siblings talking
Weight: 0.32
, cellular telephone
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31
, dial
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is misleading 1.00
is waves misleading 0.90
is epithelial misleading 0.76
is tidal waves misleading 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(calling, is misleading)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(calling, is misleading)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(calling, is misleading)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(calling, is waves misleading)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(calling, is misleading)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(calling, is waves misleading)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(calling, is misleading)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(calling, is waves misleading)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(calling, is misleading)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(calling, is epithelial misleading)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(calling, is misleading)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(calling, is waves misleading)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(calling, is misleading)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(calling, is tidal waves misleading)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(calling, is misleading)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(calling, is epithelial misleading)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(calling, is misleading)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(calling, is epithelial misleading)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(calling, is misleading)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(calling, is epithelial misleading)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(calling, is misleading)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(calling, is tidal waves misleading)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(calling, is misleading)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(calling, is tidal waves misleading)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(calling, is misleading)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(calling, is tidal waves misleading)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(calling, is misleading)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(calling, is misleading)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(calling, is misleading)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(calling, is misleading)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(calling, is misleading)