callus: hurt bad

Related concepts

Parents	problem Weight: 0.57 , foot Weight: 0.46 , tissue Weight: 0.44 , scar Weight: 0.44 , abrasion Weight: 0.42
Siblings	thyroid problem Weight: 0.33 , bone tissue Weight: 0.33 , macular degeneration Weight: 0.32 , cyst Weight: 0.32 , dandruff Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
hurt bad	1.00
hurt	0.95
has quality bad	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(foot, hurt) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(callus, hurt bad)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(callus, hurt bad)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(scar, hurt) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(callus, hurt bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(scar, hurt)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(foot, hurt)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(foot, hurt)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(scar, hurt)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(cyst, hurt)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(cyst, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(dandruff, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(foot, hurt) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(callus, hurt bad)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(scar, hurt) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(callus, hurt bad)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(callus, hurt bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(cyst, hurt) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(cyst, hurt)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(cyst, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(cyst, has quality bad)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(dandruff, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(dandruff, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(callus, hurt bad)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(callus, hurt)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(callus, hurt)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(callus, hurt)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(callus, hurt)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(callus, has quality bad)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(callus, has quality bad)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(callus, has quality bad)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(callus, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(callus, hurt bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(callus, hurt bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(scar, hurt)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(foot, hurt)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(abrasion, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(cyst, hurt)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(cyst, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(dandruff, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(scar, hurt)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(foot, hurt)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(callus, hurt bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(abrasion, has quality bad)