calorimeter: has quality questions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.58
, device
Weight: 0.53
, equipment
Weight: 0.46
, product
Weight: 0.37
Siblings spectrophotometer
Weight: 0.35
, galvanometer
Weight: 0.34
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.33
, thermistor
Weight: 0.33
, electronic device
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality questions 1.00
has quality good 0.76
is quality 0.76
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(calorimeter, has quality questions)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(calorimeter, has quality questions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(galvanometer, has quality questions)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(galvanometer, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(calorimeter, has quality questions)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(calorimeter, has quality questions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(galvanometer, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(galvanometer, has quality questions)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(galvanometer, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(galvanometer, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(smoke detector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(smoke detector, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(calorimeter, has quality questions)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(calorimeter, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(calorimeter, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(calorimeter, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(calorimeter, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(galvanometer, has quality questions)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(smoke detector, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(galvanometer, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(calorimeter, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)