calorimeter: have heat capacity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.58
, device
Weight: 0.53
, equipment
Weight: 0.46
, product
Weight: 0.37
Siblings spectrophotometer
Weight: 0.35
, galvanometer
Weight: 0.34
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.33
, thermistor
Weight: 0.33
, electronic device
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have heat capacity 1.00
go in heat 0.83
using heat 0.80
dissipate heat 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(instrument, go in heat)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(calorimeter, have heat capacity)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(calorimeter, have heat capacity)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(instrument, go in heat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, have heat capacity)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(instrument, go in heat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, have heat capacity)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, dissipate heat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(instrument, go in heat)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(calorimeter, have heat capacity)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(calorimeter, have heat capacity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(calorimeter, have heat capacity)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(electronic device, dissipate heat)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(electronic device, dissipate heat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(calorimeter, have heat capacity)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(calorimeter, have heat capacity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(calorimeter, have heat capacity)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(calorimeter, have heat capacity)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, have heat capacity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(calorimeter, have heat capacity)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(calorimeter, have heat capacity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, have heat capacity)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(instrument, go in heat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, have heat capacity)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(electronic device, dissipate heat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(calorimeter, have heat capacity)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(instrument, go in heat)