cambridge: be split into colleges

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents university
Weight: 0.68
, college
Weight: 0.60
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, city
Weight: 0.58
, company
Weight: 0.57
Siblings columbia
Weight: 0.35
, oxford
Weight: 0.35
, michigan
Weight: 0.34
, quebec city
Weight: 0.34
, lincoln
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be split into colleges 1.00
have different colleges 0.90
have colleges 0.90
have many colleges 0.88
have female colleges 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(university, have colleges)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cambridge, be split into colleges)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(university, have colleges)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(university, have colleges)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(oxford, have colleges)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(oxford, have many colleges)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(oxford, have different colleges)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(university, have colleges)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(cambridge, be split into colleges)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(oxford, have different colleges)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(oxford, have different colleges)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(oxford, have colleges)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(oxford, have colleges)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(oxford, have many colleges)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(oxford, have many colleges)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(cambridge, be split into colleges)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(cambridge, have colleges)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(cambridge, have colleges)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cambridge, have different colleges)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(cambridge, have different colleges)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(cambridge, have colleges)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(cambridge, have female colleges)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(cambridge, have many colleges)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(cambridge, have different colleges)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(cambridge, have female colleges)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cambridge, have many colleges)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(cambridge, have many colleges)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(cambridge, have female colleges)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cambridge, have many colleges)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cambridge, have female colleges)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(cambridge, have different colleges)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cambridge, have colleges)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cambridge, be split into colleges)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cambridge, be split into colleges)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(university, have colleges)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(oxford, have different colleges)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(oxford, have colleges)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(oxford, have many colleges)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cambridge, be split into colleges)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(university, have colleges)