camel: have big feet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bactrian camel
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.35
, elephant
Weight: 0.35
, donkey
Weight: 0.35
, goat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have big feet 1.00
have large feet 0.94
have two feet 0.91
need feet 0.91
have big broad feet 0.89
have wide feet 0.89
have large flat feet 0.88
has physical part feet 0.87
have fat feet 0.87
have flat feet 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(elephant, have flat feet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(elephant, have big feet)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(elephant, has physical part feet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(elephant, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(elephant, have big feet)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(elephant, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(elephant, has physical part feet)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(elephant, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(elephant, have flat feet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(camel, have big feet)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(camel, have flat feet)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(camel, have flat feet)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(camel, has physical part feet)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(camel, have flat feet)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(camel, have flat feet)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(camel, has physical part feet)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(camel, has physical part feet)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(camel, have wide feet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(camel, have wide feet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(camel, have wide feet)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(camel, have wide feet)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(camel, has physical part feet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(camel, have big feet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(camel, have big feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(elephant, has physical part feet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(elephant, have flat feet)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(camel, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(elephant, have big feet)