camel: have broad feet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bactrian camel
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.35
, elephant
Weight: 0.35
, donkey
Weight: 0.35
, goat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have broad feet 1.00
have big broad feet 0.97
have broader feet 0.92
have wide feet 0.88
have large feet 0.87
have flat wide feet 0.84
have big feet 0.83
have large flat feet 0.82
need feet 0.82
have two feet 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(camel, have broad feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(elephant, have big feet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(camel, have broad feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(elephant, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(elephant, have big feet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(camel, have broad feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(camel, have broad feet)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(camel, have broad feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(camel, have wide feet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(camel, have broad feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(camel, have big feet)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(camel, have broad feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(camel, have wide feet)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(camel, have broad feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(camel, have big feet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(camel, have broad feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(camel, have wide feet)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(camel, have broad feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(camel, have big feet)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(camel, have broad feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(camel, have wide feet)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(camel, have broad feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(camel, have big feet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(camel, have broad feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camel, have broad feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(camel, have broad feet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(camel, have broad feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camel, have broad feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(camel, have broad feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(elephant, have big feet)