camel: need fur

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bactrian camel
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.35
, elephant
Weight: 0.35
, donkey
Weight: 0.35
, goat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
need fur 1.00
have fur 0.97
have brown fur 0.93
have light fur 0.93
have thick fur 0.90
have light brown fur 0.90
be covered with fur 0.89
be covered with yellow fur 0.86
be covered with thin fur 0.84
be covered with thin yellow fur 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mammal, need fur)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(camel, need fur)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, have fur)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(camel, need fur)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mammal, have fur)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(camel, need fur)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be covered with fur)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(camel, need fur)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(mammal, need fur)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(mammal, have fur)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, have fur)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, be covered with fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(mammal, need fur)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(mammal, have fur)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, have fur)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be covered with fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(donkey, have fur)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(bactrian camel, have thick fur)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(bactrian camel, have fur)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mammal, need fur)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(camel, need fur)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, have fur)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(camel, need fur)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mammal, have fur)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(camel, need fur)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be covered with fur)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(camel, need fur)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(bactrian camel, have fur)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bactrian camel, have fur)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(donkey, have fur)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(donkey, have fur)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(bactrian camel, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(bactrian camel, have thick fur)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(camel, need fur)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(camel, have fur)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(camel, have fur)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(camel, have fur)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(camel, have fur)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, need fur)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(camel, need fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, need fur)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, have fur)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, have fur)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be covered with fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(bactrian camel, have fur)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(donkey, have fur)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(bactrian camel, have thick fur)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, need fur)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, have fur)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, have fur)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(camel, need fur)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be covered with fur)