camera lens: be focal length related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lens
Weight: 0.70
, camera
Weight: 0.70
, electronic device
Weight: 0.66
, optics
Weight: 0.65
Siblings contact lens
Weight: 0.41
, digital camera
Weight: 0.39
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.36
, mirror
Weight: 0.35
, projector
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be focal length related 1.00
be focal length 0.98
have focal length 0.98
have short focal length 0.96
be focal length related to zoom 0.95
have two focal points 0.87
be length related 0.85
be length related to zoom 0.81
be length 0.80
have length 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, be focal length related)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, be focal length related)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(lens, have short focal length)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(lens, have two focal points)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lens, have short focal length)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lens, have two focal points)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be focal length related)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be focal length related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(camera lens, be focal length related)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be focal length)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(camera lens, be focal length)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(camera lens, be focal length)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be focal length related to zoom)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, be focal length related to zoom)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(camera lens, be focal length related to zoom)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be length related)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(camera lens, be length related)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(camera lens, be length related)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be length related to zoom)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be length)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(camera lens, be length related to zoom)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(camera lens, be length related to zoom)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(camera lens, be length)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camera lens, be length)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be length)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related to zoom)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be length related)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be length related to zoom)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, be focal length related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(lens, have short focal length)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lens, have two focal points)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(lens, have short focal length)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lens, have two focal points)