camera: be banned in court

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents digital camera
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.68
, recorder
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.61
Siblings camera lens
Weight: 0.70
, human eye
Weight: 0.60
, underwater
Weight: 0.54
, cctv
Weight: 0.54
, flip
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be banned in court 1.00
be forbidden in court 0.91
be forbidden in supreme court 0.88
be prohibited in court rooms 0.87
be allowed in court 0.87
be allowed in supreme court 0.84
be allowed in federal court 0.84
be banned in courtrooms 0.82
be banned in trials 0.81
be banned in certain trials 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(camera, be banned in court)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(camera, be banned in court)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(camera, be banned in court)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(camera, be allowed in supreme court)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(camera, be banned in court)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(camera, be allowed in supreme court)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(camera, be banned in court)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(camera, be allowed in supreme court)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(camera, be banned in court)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(camera, be allowed in federal court)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(camera, be banned in court)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(camera, be allowed in court)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(camera, be banned in court)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(camera, be allowed in court)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(camera, be banned in court)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(camera, be allowed in federal court)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(camera, be banned in court)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(camera, be allowed in court)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(camera, be banned in court)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(camera, be allowed in supreme court)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(camera, be banned in court)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(camera, be allowed in court)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(camera, be banned in court)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(camera, be allowed in federal court)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(camera, be banned in court)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(camera, be allowed in federal court)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(camera, be banned in court)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(camera, be banned in court)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(camera, be banned in court)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(camera, be banned in court)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(camera, be banned in court)