camera: be better than film

Related concepts

Parents	digital camera Weight: 0.75 , electronic device Weight: 0.68 , recorder Weight: 0.64 , driver Weight: 0.61
Siblings	camera lens Weight: 0.70 , human eye Weight: 0.60 , underwater Weight: 0.54 , cctv Weight: 0.54 , flip Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be better than film	1.00
be better than film cameras	0.89
be used to film movies	0.87
be more efficient than film cameras	0.85
focus images onto film	0.76
has quality better	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.04

Plausible(digital camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(camera, be better than film)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(camera, be better than film)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(digital camera, be more efficient than film cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(camera, be better than film)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(digital camera, be better than film)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Plausible(digital camera, be more efficient than film cameras)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be more efficient than film cameras)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(cctv, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.04

Plausible(digital camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(camera, be better than film)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(camera, be better than film)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(digital camera, be more efficient than film cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(camera, be better than film)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(cctv, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(cctv, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(camera, be better than film)

Similarity expansion

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(camera, be more efficient than film cameras)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(camera, be more efficient than film cameras)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(camera, be more efficient than film cameras)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(camera, be better than film cameras)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(camera, be more efficient than film cameras)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(camera, focus images onto film)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Salient(camera, focus images onto film)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Salient(camera, be better than film cameras)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(camera, focus images onto film)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(camera, focus images onto film)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(camera, be better than film cameras)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(camera, be better than film cameras)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(camera, be better than film)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(camera, be better than film)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(digital camera, be more efficient than film cameras)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(cctv, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(camera, be better than film) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(digital camera, be more efficient than film cameras)