camera: be different from regular cameras

Related concepts

Parents	digital camera Weight: 0.75 , electronic device Weight: 0.68 , recorder Weight: 0.64 , driver Weight: 0.61
Siblings	camera lens Weight: 0.70 , human eye Weight: 0.60 , underwater Weight: 0.54 , cctv Weight: 0.54 , flip Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be different from regular cameras	1.00
be different from cameras	0.95
be different from traditional cameras	0.92
have cameras	0.90
is cameras	0.89
be called cameras	0.89
be better than film cameras	0.85
be more efficient than film cameras	0.83
is camera	0.82
is video camera	0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(driver, have cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(camera, be different from regular cameras)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(camera, be different from regular cameras)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(digital camera, be different from cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(camera, be different from regular cameras)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(digital camera, be different from traditional cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(camera, be different from regular cameras)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(digital camera, be more efficient than film cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(camera, be different from regular cameras)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(digital camera, be different from cameras)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(digital camera, be different from traditional cameras)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(driver, have cameras)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Plausible(digital camera, be more efficient than film cameras)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be different from cameras)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be more efficient than film cameras)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be different from traditional cameras)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(driver, have cameras)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(flip, is video camera)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(flip, is camera)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(cctv, is cameras)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(driver, have cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(camera, be different from regular cameras)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(digital camera, be different from cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(camera, be different from regular cameras)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(digital camera, be different from traditional cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(camera, be different from regular cameras)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(camera, be different from regular cameras)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(digital camera, be more efficient than film cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(camera, be different from regular cameras)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(cctv, is cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(cctv, is cameras)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(flip, is camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(flip, is camera)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(flip, is video camera) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(flip, is video camera)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(camera, be different from regular cameras)

Similarity expansion

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(camera, be different from traditional cameras)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(camera, be called cameras)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(camera, be different from traditional cameras)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Salient(camera, be called cameras)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(camera, be different from traditional cameras)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(camera, be called cameras)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Salient(camera, be better than film cameras)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(camera, be better than film cameras)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(camera, be more efficient than film cameras)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(camera, be more efficient than film cameras)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(camera, be more efficient than film cameras)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(camera, be better than film cameras)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(camera, be more efficient than film cameras)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(camera, be better than film cameras)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(camera, be called cameras)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(camera, be different from traditional cameras)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(camera, be different from regular cameras)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(digital camera, be different from cameras)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(digital camera, be different from traditional cameras)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(digital camera, be more efficient than film cameras)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(driver, have cameras)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(cctv, is cameras)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(flip, is camera)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(flip, is video camera)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(digital camera, be different from cameras)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(digital camera, be different from traditional cameras)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(driver, have cameras)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(camera, be different from regular cameras) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(digital camera, be more efficient than film cameras)