camera: be in office

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents digital camera
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.68
, recorder
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.61
Siblings camera lens
Weight: 0.70
, human eye
Weight: 0.60
, underwater
Weight: 0.54
, cctv
Weight: 0.54
, flip
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in office 1.00
office 0.99
be are used in office 0.89
follow office 0.88
be are used in medical office 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(recorder, office)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(camera, be in office)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(camera, be in office)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, be are used in medical office)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(camera, be in office)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(camera, be in office)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be are used in office)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(camera, be in office)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be are used in medical office)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(camera, be in office)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(recorder, office)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(camera, be in office)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(recorder, office)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(camera, be in office)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be are used in office)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(camera, be in office)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be are used in medical office)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(recorder, office)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(camera, be in office)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(camera, be in office)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(camera, be in office)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(camera, be in office)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, be are used in medical office)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(camera, be in office)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(camera, be in office)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(camera, be in office)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(camera, be in office)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(camera, be in office)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(camera, be are used in medical office)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(camera, be in office)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(camera, be are used in medical office)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(camera, be in office)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(camera, be are used in medical office)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(camera, be in office)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(camera, be are used in medical office)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(camera, be in office)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(camera, be in office)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(camera, be in office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(camera, be in office)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(camera, be in office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(camera, be in office)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(recorder, office)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(camera, be in office)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(digital camera, be are used in office)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(camera, be in office)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(digital camera, be are used in medical office)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(camera, be in office)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(digital camera, be are used in office)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(camera, be in office)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(digital camera, be are used in medical office)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(camera, be in office)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(recorder, office)