camera: have lens cap on camera

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents digital camera
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.68
, recorder
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.61
Siblings camera lens
Weight: 0.70
, human eye
Weight: 0.60
, underwater
Weight: 0.54
, cctv
Weight: 0.54
, flip
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
have lens cap on camera 1.00
is camera 0.87
have convex lens 0.85
need lenses 0.84
is video camera 0.83
have just one lense 0.82
have one lense 0.81
is lense 0.80
store images in camera 0.80
is cameras 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(digital camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(camera, have lens cap on camera)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(digital camera, store images in camera)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, store images in camera)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(flip, is video camera)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(flip, is camera)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(cctv, is cameras)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(digital camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(camera, have lens cap on camera)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(flip, is camera)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(flip, is camera)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(cctv, is cameras)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(cctv, is cameras)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(flip, is video camera)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(flip, is video camera)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(camera, have lens cap on camera)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(camera, need lenses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(camera, store images in camera)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(camera, need lenses)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(camera, need lenses)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(camera, need lenses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(camera, store images in camera)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(camera, store images in camera)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(camera, have lens cap on camera)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(camera, have lens cap on camera)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(digital camera, store images in camera)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(flip, is camera)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(cctv, is cameras)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(flip, is video camera)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(camera, have lens cap on camera)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(digital camera, store images in camera)