camera: store images in camera

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents digital camera
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.68
, recorder
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.61
Siblings camera lens
Weight: 0.70
, human eye
Weight: 0.60
, underwater
Weight: 0.54
, cctv
Weight: 0.54
, flip
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
store images in camera 1.00
store images 0.95
is video camera 0.90
is camera 0.90
capture images 0.84
is cameras 0.83
flip images 0.83
be called cameras 0.82
have cameras 0.82
capture pictures 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(digital camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(camera, store images in camera)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(digital camera, store images)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(camera, store images in camera)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(driver, have cameras)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(camera, store images in camera)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(digital camera, capture images)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(camera, store images in camera)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(digital camera, store images in camera)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(digital camera, store images)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(digital camera, capture images)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(driver, have cameras)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(driver, have cameras)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, store images)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, store images in camera)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, capture images)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(flip, is video camera)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(flip, is camera)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(cctv, is cameras)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(digital camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(camera, store images in camera)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(digital camera, store images)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(camera, store images in camera)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(digital camera, capture images)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(camera, store images in camera)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(driver, have cameras)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(camera, store images in camera)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(flip, is camera)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(flip, is camera)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(flip, is video camera)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(flip, is video camera)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(cctv, is cameras)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(cctv, is cameras)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(camera, store images in camera)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(camera, store images)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(camera, store images)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(camera, be called cameras)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(camera, store images)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(camera, store images)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(camera, be called cameras)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(camera, be called cameras)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(camera, be called cameras)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(camera, store images in camera)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(digital camera, store images in camera)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(digital camera, store images)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(digital camera, capture images)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(driver, have cameras)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(cctv, is cameras)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(flip, is camera)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(flip, is video camera)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(digital camera, store images in camera)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(digital camera, store images)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(digital camera, capture images)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(driver, have cameras)