camera: were made

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents digital camera
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.68
, recorder
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.61
Siblings camera lens
Weight: 0.70
, human eye
Weight: 0.60
, underwater
Weight: 0.54
, cctv
Weight: 0.54
, flip
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
were made 1.00
be made 0.93
were then 0.81
were used in past 0.79
be are used 0.78
were created 0.77
been are improved 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, be made)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(camera, were made)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(digital camera, be are used)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(camera, were made)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(digital camera, were used in past)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(camera, were made)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(digital camera, been are improved)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(camera, were made)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be made)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(digital camera, were used in past)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(digital camera, been are improved)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be are used)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be made)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, were used in past)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, been are improved)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be are used)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, be made)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(camera, were made)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(digital camera, be are used)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(camera, were made)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(digital camera, were used in past)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(camera, were made)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(digital camera, been are improved)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(camera, were made)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(camera, were made)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(camera, be made)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(camera, be made)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(camera, be made)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(camera, be made)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(camera, been are improved)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(camera, been are improved)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(camera, been are improved)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(camera, been are improved)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(camera, were created)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(camera, were used in past)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(camera, were used in past)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(camera, were created)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(camera, were created)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(camera, were used in past)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(camera, were used in past)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(camera, were created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(camera, were made)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(camera, were made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(digital camera, be made)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(digital camera, be are used)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(digital camera, were used in past)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(digital camera, been are improved)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(digital camera, be made)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(digital camera, be are used)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(digital camera, been are improved)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(camera, were made)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(digital camera, were used in past)