camouflage: is good adaptation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adaptation
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, print
Weight: 0.55
, pattern
Weight: 0.53
, design
Weight: 0.53
Siblings tan
Weight: 0.32
, hair color
Weight: 0.32
, mask
Weight: 0.32
, blue line
Weight: 0.32
, armor
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good adaptation 1.00
is adaptation 0.98
be adaptation 0.97
be considered adaptation 0.95
be example of adaptation 0.93
be example of evolutionary adaptation 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(camouflage, is good adaptation)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(camouflage, is good adaptation)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(camouflage, is good adaptation)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(camouflage, be adaptation)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(camouflage, is good adaptation)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(camouflage, is adaptation)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(camouflage, is good adaptation)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(camouflage, is good adaptation)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(camouflage, is good adaptation)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(camouflage, is good adaptation)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(camouflage, be example of adaptation)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(camouflage, is good adaptation)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(camouflage, is adaptation)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(camouflage, is good adaptation)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(camouflage, be adaptation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(camouflage, is good adaptation)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(camouflage, be example of adaptation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(camouflage, is good adaptation)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(camouflage, is good adaptation)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(camouflage, be example of evolutionary adaptation)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(camouflage, is good adaptation)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(camouflage, is adaptation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(camouflage, is good adaptation)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(camouflage, be adaptation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(camouflage, is good adaptation)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(camouflage, be example of adaptation)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(camouflage, is good adaptation)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(camouflage, be example of evolutionary adaptation)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(camouflage, is good adaptation)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(camouflage, be example of evolutionary adaptation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(camouflage, is good adaptation)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, be example of evolutionary adaptation)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(camouflage, is good adaptation)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, be example of adaptation)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(camouflage, is good adaptation)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, is adaptation)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(camouflage, is good adaptation)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, be adaptation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(camouflage, is good adaptation)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(camouflage, is good adaptation)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, is good adaptation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(camouflage, is good adaptation)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(camouflage, is good adaptation)