campaign: be in texas expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.65
, movement
Weight: 0.62
, organization
Weight: 0.62
, topic
Weight: 0.61
Siblings race
Weight: 0.62
, advertisement
Weight: 0.61
, sweepstakes
Weight: 0.54
, epictetus
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in texas expensive 1.00
be in texas 0.96
be for governor of texas expensive 0.87
be for governor of texas 0.83
start in iowa 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(campaign, be in texas expensive)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(campaign, be in texas expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(campaign, be in texas expensive)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(campaign, be in texas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(campaign, be in texas expensive)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(campaign, be for governor of texas expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(campaign, be in texas expensive)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(campaign, be in texas)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(campaign, be in texas expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(campaign, be in texas)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(campaign, be in texas expensive)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(campaign, be in texas)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(campaign, be in texas expensive)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(campaign, be for governor of texas expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(campaign, be in texas expensive)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(campaign, be for governor of texas)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(campaign, be in texas expensive)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(campaign, start in iowa)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(campaign, be in texas expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(campaign, be for governor of texas expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(campaign, be in texas expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(campaign, be for governor of texas)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(campaign, be in texas expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(campaign, be for governor of texas expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(campaign, be in texas expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(campaign, be for governor of texas)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(campaign, be in texas expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(campaign, start in iowa)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(campaign, be in texas expensive)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(campaign, start in iowa)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(campaign, be in texas expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(campaign, be for governor of texas)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(campaign, be in texas expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(campaign, start in iowa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(campaign, be in texas expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(campaign, be in texas expensive)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(campaign, be in texas expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(campaign, be in texas expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(campaign, be in texas expensive)