campaign: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.65
, movement
Weight: 0.62
, organization
Weight: 0.62
, topic
Weight: 0.61
Siblings race
Weight: 0.62
, advertisement
Weight: 0.61
, sweepstakes
Weight: 0.54
, epictetus
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(campaign, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(campaign, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(advertisement, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(advertisement, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(campaign, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(campaign, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(campaign, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(campaign, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(campaign, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(campaign, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(campaign, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(campaign, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(advertisement, has quality good)