camping: be limited in caed nua

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adventure
Weight: 0.65
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, hobby
Weight: 0.61
, experience
Weight: 0.58
, water sport
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hiking
Weight: 0.57
, rafting
Weight: 0.35
, canoeing
Weight: 0.34
, boating
Weight: 0.34
, fishing
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be limited in caed nua 1.00
be limited in nua 1.00
is limited 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(adventure, is limited)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(camping, be limited in caed nua)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(camping, be limited in caed nua)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(adventure, is limited)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(camping, be limited in caed nua)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(adventure, is limited)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(adventure, is limited)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(camping, be limited in caed nua)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(camping, be limited in caed nua)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(camping, be limited in caed nua)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(camping, be limited in caed nua)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(camping, be limited in caed nua)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(camping, be limited in nua)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(camping, be limited in caed nua)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(camping, be limited in nua)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(camping, be limited in caed nua)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(camping, be limited in nua)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(camping, be limited in caed nua)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(camping, be limited in nua)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(camping, be limited in caed nua)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(camping, be limited in caed nua)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(camping, be limited in caed nua)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(camping, be limited in caed nua)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(camping, be limited in caed nua)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(camping, be limited in caed nua)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(adventure, is limited)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(camping, be limited in caed nua)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(adventure, is limited)