camping: be popular in city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adventure
Weight: 0.65
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, hobby
Weight: 0.61
, experience
Weight: 0.58
, water sport
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hiking
Weight: 0.57
, rafting
Weight: 0.35
, canoeing
Weight: 0.34
, boating
Weight: 0.34
, fishing
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular in city 1.00
is popular 0.84
is more popular 0.80
is very popular 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(camping, be popular in city)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fishing, is more popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(camping, be popular in city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rafting, is popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(camping, be popular in city)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fishing, is popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(camping, be popular in city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hiking, is popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(camping, be popular in city)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hiking, is popular)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(hiking, is popular)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(camping, be popular in city)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(fishing, is popular)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(fishing, is popular)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(camping, be popular in city)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(rafting, is popular)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rafting, is popular)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(camping, be popular in city)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(fishing, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(fishing, is more popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(camping, be popular in city)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(camping, be popular in city)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(camping, be popular in city)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(camping, is popular)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(camping, be popular in city)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(camping, is popular)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(camping, be popular in city)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(camping, is popular)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(camping, be popular in city)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(camping, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(camping, be popular in city)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(camping, be popular in city)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(camping, be popular in city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(camping, be popular in city)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(camping, be popular in city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(camping, be popular in city)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(hiking, is popular)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(camping, be popular in city)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rafting, is popular)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(camping, be popular in city)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fishing, is popular)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(camping, be popular in city)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fishing, is more popular)