camping: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adventure
Weight: 0.65
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, hobby
Weight: 0.61
, experience
Weight: 0.58
, water sport
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hiking
Weight: 0.57
, rafting
Weight: 0.35
, canoeing
Weight: 0.34
, boating
Weight: 0.34
, fishing
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
be bad year 0.79
be for service bad 0.78
be considered bad 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(experience, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camping, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(experience, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camping, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hobby, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camping, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hobby, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camping, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(adventure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camping, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camping, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(fee, be for service bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camping, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hobby, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(fee, be for service bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(adventure, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hobby, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(fee, be for service bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hobby, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hobby, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(adventure, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fishing, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be bad year)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(boating, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(canoeing, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fishing, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(hiking, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(experience, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(camping, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hobby, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(camping, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(experience, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(camping, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hobby, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(camping, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(adventure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(camping, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(camping, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(fee, be for service bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(camping, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(boating, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(hiking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(hiking, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(fishing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fishing, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(canoeing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(canoeing, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(fishing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fishing, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(fishing, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fishing, be bad year)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(camping, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(camping, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(camping, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(camping, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(camping, be considered bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(camping, be considered bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(camping, be considered bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(camping, be considered bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camping, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fee, be for service bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(experience, has quality better)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(adventure, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hobby, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hobby, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(experience, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(experience, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fishing, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(boating, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hiking, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fishing, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(canoeing, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(fishing, be bad year)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hobby, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(experience, has quality better)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(adventure, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hobby, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(experience, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fee, be for service bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(experience, has quality good)