campsite: be vs tent campsite

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.63
, location
Weight: 0.62
, facility
Weight: 0.56
, accommodation
Weight: 0.53
Siblings campground
Weight: 0.36
, park
Weight: 0.34
, hut
Weight: 0.34
, central park
Weight: 0.34
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs tent campsite 1.00
be vs tent 0.91
be made with huts 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(campsite, be vs tent campsite)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(hut, be made with huts)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(campsite, be vs tent campsite)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(hut, be made with huts)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(hut, be made with huts)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(campsite, be vs tent campsite)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(campsite, be vs tent campsite)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(campsite, be vs tent campsite)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(campsite, be vs tent)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(campsite, be vs tent campsite)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(campsite, be vs tent)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(campsite, be vs tent campsite)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(campsite, be vs tent)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(campsite, be vs tent campsite)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(campsite, be vs tent)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(campsite, be vs tent campsite)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(campsite, be vs tent campsite)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(campsite, be vs tent campsite)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(campsite, be vs tent campsite)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(campsite, be vs tent campsite)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(campsite, be vs tent campsite)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(hut, be made with huts)