can: be in jars

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents auxiliary verb
Weight: 0.61
, work
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
, application
Weight: 0.55
, system
Weight: 0.55
Siblings good will
Weight: 0.34
, do
Weight: 0.33
, think
Weight: 0.32
, know
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in jars 1.00
be called tins 0.83
be called cans 0.81
placed in freezer 0.76
be better than bottles 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(can, be in jars)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(can, be in jars)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(can, be in jars)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(can, be called cans)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(can, be in jars)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(can, be called tins)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(can, be in jars)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(can, be called cans)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(can, be in jars)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(can, be called cans)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(can, be in jars)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(can, be called tins)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(can, be in jars)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(can, placed in freezer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(can, be in jars)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(can, be called tins)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(can, be in jars)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(can, be called tins)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(can, be in jars)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(can, placed in freezer)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(can, be in jars)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(can, be called cans)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(can, be in jars)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(can, placed in freezer)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(can, be in jars)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(can, placed in freezer)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(can, be in jars)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(can, be better than bottles)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(can, be in jars)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(can, be better than bottles)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(can, be in jars)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(can, be better than bottles)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(can, be in jars)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(can, be better than bottles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(can, be in jars)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(can, be in jars)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(can, be in jars)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(can, be in jars)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(can, be in jars)