canada: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south america
Weight: 0.69
, north america
Weight: 0.69
, new zealand
Weight: 0.67
, latin america
Weight: 0.66
, european union
Weight: 0.65
Siblings alaska
Weight: 0.65
, vancouver
Weight: 0.57
, australia
Weight: 0.38
, usa
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(latin america, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(canada, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(european union, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(canada, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(european union, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(latin america, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(latin america, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(european union, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(usa, is best)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(latin america, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(canada, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(european union, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(canada, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(usa, is best)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(usa, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(canada, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(canada, has quality good)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(canada, has quality good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(canada, has quality good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(canada, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(canada, is best)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(canada, is best)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(canada, is best)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(canada, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(canada, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(canada, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(european union, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(latin america, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(usa, is best)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(european union, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(canada, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(latin america, has quality good)