canada: was in world war 2

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south america
Weight: 0.69
, north america
Weight: 0.69
, new zealand
Weight: 0.67
, latin america
Weight: 0.66
, european union
Weight: 0.65
Siblings alaska
Weight: 0.65
, vancouver
Weight: 0.57
, australia
Weight: 0.38
, usa
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
was in world war 2 1.00
was part of world war 1 0.97
was affect by world war 2 0.95
was in world war 0.95
was involved in world war 1 0.94
was involved in world war 2 0.94
was involved in war during world war 2 0.93
was involved world war 1 0.93
was affected by world war 2 0.92
was affected by world war 1 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(new zealand, was involved in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(canada, was in world war 2)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(new zealand, was involved in world war 1) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(canada, was in world war 2)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(canada, was in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(new zealand, was involved in world war 1)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(canada, was in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(new zealand, was involved in world war 2)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(canada, was in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was involved in world war 2)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(canada, was in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was involved in world war 1)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(canada, was in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(alaska, was involved in world war 2)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(new zealand, was involved in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(canada, was in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(canada, was in world war 2)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(new zealand, was involved in world war 1) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(canada, was in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(canada, was in world war 2)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(canada, was in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(alaska, was involved in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(alaska, was involved in world war 2)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(canada, was in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(canada, was in world war 2)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(canada, was in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(canada, was affected by world war 2)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(canada, was in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(canada, was affected by world war 2)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(canada, was in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(canada, was affected by world war 2)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(canada, was in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(canada, was affected by world war 2)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(canada, was in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(canada, was in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(canada, was in world war 2)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(canada, was in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(canada, was in world war 2)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(canada, was in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(new zealand, was involved in world war 1)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(canada, was in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new zealand, was involved in world war 2)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(canada, was in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(alaska, was involved in world war 2)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(canada, was in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(new zealand, was involved in world war 1)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(canada, was in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new zealand, was involved in world war 2)