canadian: be good at hockey

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents american
Weight: 0.64
, currency
Weight: 0.54
, north america
Weight: 0.49
, european
Weight: 0.48
, field
Weight: 0.47
Siblings african american
Weight: 0.37
, george washington
Weight: 0.36
, native american
Weight: 0.36
, south america
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good at hockey 1.00
love hockey 0.93
play ice hockey 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(canadian, be good at hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(canadian, be good at hockey)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(canadian, be good at hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(canadian, play ice hockey)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(canadian, be good at hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(canadian, play ice hockey)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(canadian, be good at hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(canadian, play ice hockey)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(canadian, be good at hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(canadian, love hockey)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(canadian, be good at hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(canadian, love hockey)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(canadian, be good at hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(canadian, play ice hockey)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(canadian, be good at hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(canadian, love hockey)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(canadian, be good at hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(canadian, love hockey)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(canadian, be good at hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(canadian, be good at hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(canadian, be good at hockey)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(canadian, be good at hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(canadian, be good at hockey)