canal: were built in britain

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, technology
Weight: 0.52
, part
Weight: 0.51
, feature
Weight: 0.51
Siblings root canal
Weight: 0.35
, reservoir
Weight: 0.33
, levee
Weight: 0.33
, pontoon
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
were built in britain 1.00
were built 0.82
were important built 0.79
is built 0.77
were built along st lawrence river 0.76
be in south america 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(structure, is built)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(canal, were built in britain)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(structure, is built)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(structure, is built)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(reservoir, is built)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(levee, is built)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(structure, is built)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(canal, were built in britain)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(reservoir, is built)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(reservoir, is built)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(levee, is built)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(levee, is built)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(canal, were built in britain)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(canal, were built)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(canal, were built)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(canal, were built)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(canal, were built)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(canal, is built)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(canal, is built)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(canal, is built)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(canal, were built along st lawrence river)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(canal, were important built)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(canal, be in south america)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(canal, is built)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(canal, be in south america)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(canal, be in south america)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(canal, be in south america)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(canal, were important built)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(canal, were built along st lawrence river)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(canal, were important built)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(canal, were important built)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(canal, were built along st lawrence river)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(canal, were built along st lawrence river)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(canal, were built in britain)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(canal, were built in britain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(structure, is built)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(levee, is built)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(reservoir, is built)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(canal, were built in britain)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(structure, is built)