canal: were important built

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, technology
Weight: 0.52
, part
Weight: 0.51
, feature
Weight: 0.51
Siblings root canal
Weight: 0.35
, reservoir
Weight: 0.33
, levee
Weight: 0.33
, pontoon
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
were important built 1.00
were built 0.96
is built 0.91
were important to mesopotamia 0.83
were built in britain 0.79
were needed in 1700s 0.77
were important to egyptians 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(structure, is built)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(canal, were important built)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(structure, is built)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(structure, is built)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(reservoir, is built)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(levee, is built)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(structure, is built)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(canal, were important built)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(reservoir, is built)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(reservoir, is built)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(levee, is built)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(levee, is built)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(canal, were important built)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(canal, were built)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(canal, were built)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(canal, were built)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(canal, were built)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(canal, is built)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(canal, is built)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(canal, is built)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(canal, were important to mesopotamia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(canal, were built in britain)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(canal, were built in britain)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(canal, were built in britain)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(canal, is built)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(canal, were built in britain)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(canal, were needed in 1700s)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(canal, were important to egyptians)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(canal, were important to mesopotamia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(canal, were important to mesopotamia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(canal, were needed in 1700s)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(canal, were needed in 1700s)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(canal, were important to egyptians)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(canal, were important to egyptians)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(canal, were needed in 1700s)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(canal, were important to mesopotamia)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(canal, were important to egyptians)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(canal, were important built)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(canal, were important built)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(structure, is built)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(levee, is built)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(reservoir, is built)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(canal, were important built)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(structure, is built)