canal: were important to egyptians

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, technology
Weight: 0.52
, part
Weight: 0.51
, feature
Weight: 0.51
Siblings root canal
Weight: 0.35
, reservoir
Weight: 0.33
, levee
Weight: 0.33
, pontoon
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
were important to egyptians 1.00
were important to ancient egyptians 0.90
were important to mesopotamia 0.88
were important in revolution 0.79
were important to revolution 0.78
were important in first revolution 0.78
were important built 0.76
were needed in 1700s 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(canal, were important to egyptians)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(canal, were important to ancient egyptians)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(canal, were important to ancient egyptians)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(canal, were important to mesopotamia)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(canal, were important to mesopotamia)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(canal, were important to ancient egyptians)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(canal, were important to mesopotamia)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(canal, were important in revolution)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(canal, were important in first revolution)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(canal, were important to revolution)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(canal, were important in revolution)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(canal, were important to revolution)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(canal, were important in first revolution)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(canal, were important in revolution)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(canal, were important built)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(canal, were needed in 1700s)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(canal, were important in first revolution)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(canal, were important to revolution)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(canal, were important built)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(canal, were needed in 1700s)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(canal, were important built)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(canal, were needed in 1700s)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(canal, were important to ancient egyptians)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(canal, were important in first revolution)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(canal, were important in revolution)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(canal, were important to mesopotamia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(canal, were important to revolution)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(canal, were important built)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(canal, were needed in 1700s)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(canal, were important to egyptians)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(canal, were important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(canal, were important to egyptians)