canberra: is planned

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.54
, new south wales
Weight: 0.51
, australia
Weight: 0.50
, capital
Weight: 0.46
Siblings brisbane
Weight: 0.33
, adelaide
Weight: 0.33
, sydney
Weight: 0.32
, tasmania
Weight: 0.32
, auckland
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is planned 1.00
was planned 0.98
is planned city 0.94
be regarded as planned city 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(canberra, is planned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(canberra, is planned)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(canberra, is planned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(canberra, was planned)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(canberra, is planned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(canberra, is planned city)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(canberra, is planned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(canberra, was planned)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(canberra, is planned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(canberra, was planned)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(canberra, is planned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(canberra, be regarded as planned city)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(canberra, is planned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(canberra, is planned city)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(canberra, is planned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(canberra, is planned city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(canberra, is planned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(canberra, be regarded as planned city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(canberra, is planned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(canberra, be regarded as planned city)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(canberra, is planned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was planned)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(canberra, is planned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(canberra, is planned city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(canberra, is planned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(canberra, be regarded as planned city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(canberra, is planned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(canberra, is planned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(canberra, is planned)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(canberra, is planned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(canberra, is planned)