canberra: is zoo

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.54
, new south wales
Weight: 0.51
, australia
Weight: 0.50
, capital
Weight: 0.46
Siblings brisbane
Weight: 0.33
, adelaide
Weight: 0.33
, sydney
Weight: 0.32
, tasmania
Weight: 0.32
, auckland
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is zoo 1.00
is zoo hotel 0.91
is aquarium 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(canberra, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(auckland, is zoo)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(canberra, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brisbane, is zoo)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(canberra, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(auckland, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(auckland, is zoo)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(canberra, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(brisbane, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(brisbane, is zoo)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(canberra, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(canberra, is zoo)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(canberra, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(canberra, is aquarium)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(canberra, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(canberra, is aquarium)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(canberra, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(canberra, is aquarium)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(canberra, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(canberra, is aquarium)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(canberra, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(canberra, is zoo hotel)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(canberra, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(canberra, is zoo hotel)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(canberra, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(canberra, is zoo hotel)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(canberra, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(canberra, is zoo hotel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(canberra, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(canberra, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(canberra, is zoo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(canberra, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(canberra, is zoo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(canberra, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(auckland, is zoo)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(canberra, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(brisbane, is zoo)