canberra: was founded

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.54
, new south wales
Weight: 0.51
, australia
Weight: 0.50
, capital
Weight: 0.46
Siblings brisbane
Weight: 0.33
, adelaide
Weight: 0.33
, sydney
Weight: 0.32
, tasmania
Weight: 0.32
, auckland
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was founded 1.00
was established 0.78
was created 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, was established)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(brisbane, was established)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(canberra, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(brisbane, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(brisbane, was established)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(canberra, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(adelaide, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(adelaide, was established)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(canberra, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(canberra, was founded)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(canberra, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(canberra, was established)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(canberra, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(canberra, was established)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(canberra, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(canberra, was established)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(canberra, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(canberra, was created)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(canberra, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was established)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(canberra, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(canberra, was created)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(canberra, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(canberra, was created)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(canberra, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(canberra, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(canberra, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was founded)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(canberra, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(canberra, was founded)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(adelaide, was established)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(brisbane, was established)