candidate: has quality class

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents political party
Weight: 0.68
, person
Weight: 0.60
, individual
Weight: 0.60
, activist
Weight: 0.57
Siblings third party
Weight: 0.69
, general election
Weight: 0.65
, congressman
Weight: 0.63
, democrat
Weight: 0.63
, libertarian
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality class 1.00
has quality better 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(candidate, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(democrat, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(candidate, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(democrat, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(democrat, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(candidate, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(candidate, has quality class)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(candidate, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(candidate, has quality better)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(candidate, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(candidate, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(candidate, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(candidate, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(candidate, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(candidate, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(candidate, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(candidate, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(candidate, has quality class)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(candidate, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(candidate, has quality class)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(candidate, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(democrat, has quality better)